Search

The StressCheck Methodology

Finite element method (FEM) is a method by which an approximate solution is obtained to the exact solution of some problem. For example, in linear elasticity, the solution domain, the material properties, the loading conditions and constraint conditions define a problem that has a unique exact solution in the displacements (uEX). A finite element solution (uFE) is an approximation to uEX. The quality of approximation depends on the finite element mesh and the polynomial degree of the elements.

Read More on the Technical Briefs:

Classical Model Problems

Users want to know: How well does your finite element analysis software predict the response of a physical system to an applied load?  A comparison is made to test data if available, or benchmark solutions (e.g. classical methods, text books).  ESRD provides with the StressCheck software a Handbook Library of parametrically defined models for comparison to published solutions from Timenshenko, Peterson, Mura, Tada, Blevins, Roark, et al.  If there are differences, do they result from the mathematical model (in this case an approximation using the finite element method) or are they the result of errors in idealization (boundary conditions, material properties, etc.)?

StressCheck is the only FEA software tool on the market that provides feedback to the user regarding the quality of the computed information.  This 'verification' process assesses the sensitivity of the computed data to changes in the mesh density, order of the element shape functions, and element mapping.  Verification is an important first step in validating the model.

  • Verification - Am I solving the equations right?
  • Validation - Am I solving the right equations?

It is clear that validation can only be achieved if verification of the data of interest has been completed.

General guidelines pertaining to the use of mathematical models in solid mechanics were issued by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) in 2006 and adopted by the American National Standards Institute. This document describes the importance of verification and validation.

We invite those who are user's of FEA tools to solve the classical 
Girkmann Problem:

  1. Stress resultants Qa (shearing force, kN/m) and Ma (bending moment, Nm/m)
  2. The location and magnitude of the maximum bending moment in the shell.
  3. Verify the results are accurate to within 5 percent.  Describe how accuracy was verified.
  4. Software used, what mesh and type of elements were used.

ESRD recieved responses to this exercise from 15 FEA experts using a range of different modeling techniques and FEA software tools.   

Click here to view the results of the study.  These results are also posted in the IACM bulletin.
 

 

StressCheck is the only FEA program in existence today which was designed for controlling both the errors of discretization and idealization.

  • The errors of discretization are the errors controllable by the finite element mesh and the polynomial degree (h- or p-extensions).
  • The errors of idealization are the errors associated with the restrictions incorporated in mathematical model.

Without control of both types of errors, it is impossible to validate the model. Read more...

 

P-FEM Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the p-version FEM important?

The finite element method (FEM) provides an approximate solution.  In engineering practice it is important to know not only the information one wishes to compute but also to have an indication about the size of error of FEM approximation.  The p-version FEM makes it convenient and efficient to obtain error estimates in terms of the data of interest.

Are error estimation procedures available in h-version codes?

Most h-version software programs offer some form of adaptive capability.  The theory of adaptive mesh construction was developed in the 1970's by Babuska and Rheinboldt.  The objective of an h-adaptive process is to obtain a sequence of finite element meshes in such a way that the error measured in energy norm is minimal, or nearly minimal, for each mesh.  Subsequently, Zienkiewicz and Zhou proposed an adaptive scheme, variants of which have been implemented in h-version programs.  In general, h-version programs do not provide convenient and reliable means for making an assessment of the quality of computed information.

Read More FAQ

Home  |  Products  |  Services  |  Technology  |  Corporate  |  Site Map
Copyright 2012 by ESRD, Inc.   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use