Notes on Finite Element Modeling
Abstract: It is important to make a clear distinction between numerical simulation and finite element modeling: 1. In numerical simulation an idea of a physical reality is precisely stated in the form of mathematical equations. Model form errors, uncertainties in input data, and the errors of numerical approximation are estimated and controlled separately. This is possible only if the underlying mathematical problem (such as a problem of continuum mechanics) is well posed and the numerical problem satisfies the requirements of consistency and stability. 2. In finite element modeling, on the other hand, a numerical problem is constructed by piecing together elements from the element library of a finite element analysis (FEA) software product without providing evidence that the underlying mathematical problem is well posed and the numerical problem satisfies the requirements of consistency and stability. Therefore, we cannot assume that numerical convergence will exist, or that a numerical error can be computed.
Looking for Resources?
Recent News & Events
“Aerospace materials scientists and structural engineers now have a new state-of-the-art software product called StressCheck®, which provides efficient and reliable analysis tools for composite bonded aircraft structures. A composites research team from the aeronautics industry, known as the Composites Affordability Initiative (CAI), has just completed an extensive study of current capabilities in the area of failure analysis tools for composite bonded joints. This study led the CAI team to unanimously choose StressCheck® as the software tool to replace as well as radically improve existing industry standard software currently used to size bonded joints.”
Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)