Notes on Finite Element Modeling
Abstract: It is important to make a clear distinction between numerical simulation and finite element modeling: 1. In numerical simulation an idea of a physical reality is precisely stated in the form of mathematical equations. Model form errors, uncertainties in input data, and the errors of numerical approximation are estimated and controlled separately. This is possible only if the underlying mathematical problem (such as a problem of continuum mechanics) is well posed and the numerical problem satisfies the requirements of consistency and stability. 2. In finite element modeling, on the other hand, a numerical problem is constructed by piecing together elements from the element library of a finite element analysis (FEA) software product without providing evidence that the underlying mathematical problem is well posed and the numerical problem satisfies the requirements of consistency and stability. Therefore, we cannot assume that numerical convergence will exist, or that a numerical error can be computed.
Related ESRD Resources
Looking for Resources?
Recent News & Events
“As the United States Air Force continues to extend the service life of their aircraft the Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) has had to refine the methods it uses to analyze and predict fatigue crack growth. Through the use StressCheck®, coupled with AFGROW, we in A-10 ASIP have been able to more accurately model, predict and analyze critical aircraft structure for the A-10 and other types of structure for non-A-10 system managers. This also allows us within the A-10 to more accurately assess risk for decision makers, streamline aircraft inductions into scheduled maintenance and reduce cost for total life cycle management.”
A-10 ASIP Manager