ESRD will be attending AA&S 2017 in Phoenix, AZ from May 22-25. Come visit Gordon and Jason at our booth (119) and attend Jason’s training course “StressCheck + Fracture: Best Practices & Live Demo” on Monday, May 22, 2017 @ 6PM.
You also might be interested in
Recently, Wiley published the second edition of "Finite Element Analysis: Method, Verification and Validation" by ESRD Co-Founders Dr. Barna Szabo and Dr. Ivo Babuška as part of their "Wiley Series in Computational Mechanics". This edition provides an updated and comprehensive review of the theoretical foundation of the finite element method, and provides engineering students and professionals the tools, concepts, techniques, and procedures that help with an understanding of finite element analysis.
In one of my conference presentations, I discussed variational crimes, noting that using point forces and point constraints in finite element analysis serves as examples of such crimes. In the question-and-answer session, I was asked: “If using point constraints is a variational crime, then how is it possible that the structure designed to refloat the Costa Concordia was full of those crimes and yet it worked just fine.” This question presented an opportunity for me to explain that finite element modeling (FEM) and finite element analysis (FEA) are complementary methods when analysts correctly understand their respective domains of application and use them accordingly. However, problems arise when FEM is used outside its scope, which is an all too frequent error.
At present, a very substantial unrealized potential exists in numerical simulation. Simulation technology has matured to the point where management can realistically expect the reliability of predictions based on numerical simulations to match the reliability of observations in physical experimentation. This will require management to upgrade simulation practices through exercising simulation governance.
Looking for Resources?
Recent News & Events
Quick Links
Testimonials
-
“As the United States Air Force continues to extend the service life of their aircraft the Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) has had to refine the methods it uses to analyze and predict fatigue crack growth. Through the use StressCheck, coupled with AFGROW, we in A-10 ASIP have been able to more accurately model, predict and analyze critical aircraft structure for the A-10 and other types of structure for non-A-10 system managers. This also allows us within the A-10 to more accurately assess risk for decision makers, streamline aircraft inductions into scheduled maintenance and reduce cost for total life cycle management.”
A-10 ASIP Manager
Leave a Reply
We appreciate your feedback!
You must be logged in to post a comment.