• About
    • Who We Are
    • Partners & Providers
    • News & Events
    • The ESRD Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Applications
    • What We Solve
    • Detailed Stress
    • Composites
    • Fracture Mechanics
    • Residual Stress
    • Sim Apps
  • Products
    • What We Develop
    • StressCheck Professional
      • StressCheck Core
      • Solvers
      • Advanced Modules
      • Utilities
      • Academic Licensing
    • StressCheck Apps
      • CAE Handbook
      • StressCheck Tool Box
    • Product Updates
  • Support
    • How We Can Help
    • Training
    • Webinars
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Help Documentation
    • Software FAQ’s
  • Simulation
    • How We Simulate
    • Benchmarks
    • Simulation Governance
    • History of FEA
    • Dictionary & Terms
  • Resources
    • Browse Our Resource Library
    • White Papers
    • Case Studies
    • Product Demos
    • StressCheck Tutorials
Serving the Numerical Simulation community since 1989
  • Contact Us
  • Register
Login
Forgot Password?
Join Us
ESRDESRD
ESRDESRD
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Partners & Providers
    • News & Events
    • The ESRD Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Applications
    • What We Solve
    • Detailed Stress
    • Composites
    • Fracture Mechanics
    • Residual Stress
    • Sim Apps
  • Products
    • What We Develop
    • StressCheck Professional
      • StressCheck Core
      • Solvers
      • Advanced Modules
      • Utilities
      • Academic Licensing
    • StressCheck Apps
      • CAE Handbook
      • StressCheck Tool Box
    • Product Updates
  • Support
    • How We Can Help
    • Training
    • Webinars
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Help Documentation
    • Software FAQ’s
  • Simulation
    • How We Simulate
    • Benchmarks
    • Simulation Governance
    • History of FEA
    • Dictionary & Terms
  • Resources
    • Browse Our Resource Library
    • White Papers
    • Case Studies
    • Product Demos
    • StressCheck Tutorials

Meshing & Discretization

Home Meshing & Discretization

FAQ Category: Meshing & Discretization

What Are the Requirements for Using Triangle and/or Quadrilateral Elements in StressCheck?

  • Date: April 29, 2024
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization, Model Inputs, Solver & FEA Implementation
In StressCheck, Triangle (3-sided) elements and Quadrilateral (4-sided) elements are available for meshing geometric surfaces and curves for subsequent engineering simulations. The following are the requirements (and limitations) for using Triangle and/or Quadrilateral elements in Planar, Extrude, Axisymmetric and 3D analyses.
Read More

What Do the MeshSim Global Automeshing Parameter Inputs Affect?

  • Date: November 21, 2017
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization
In order to generate an automatic mesh (automesh) for a sheet or solid body, at least one global MeshSim automesh record must be active and associated with the sheet or solid body. The MeshSim automesh inputs depend on the version of StressCheck.
Read More

What is the Size Input for Local Automeshing?

  • Date: October 30, 2017
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization
The "Size/Local Size" parameter is typically the absolute size of the elements in and around the assigned point/curve/surface after Local automeshing (Create > Mesh > Local/Local Size).
Read More

What Is The General Automeshing Strategy For A 3D Complex Solid?

  • Date: March 16, 2017
  • By: ESRD Admin
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization
When automeshing a complex 3D solid body, the goal should always be to use the minimum mesh refinement, combined with p-extensions, to converge in the data of interest in as few degrees of freedom (DOF) as possible.
Read More

What’s the Difference Between Quadratic and Geometric Mapping?

  • Date: June 8, 2018
  • By: Andrew
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization, Solver & FEA Implementation
Before we explore the answer to this question, let’s review a two important definitions regarding finite element method implementations: Mapping and Isoparametric Elements.
Read More

Why Is There a Recommended Maximum P-level for Quadratically Mapped Automeshes?

  • Date: June 28, 2018
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization, Solver & FEA Implementation
In general, it is recommended not to exceed a polynomial level (p-level) of p = 5 when solving a model with quadratically mapped (i.e. "Isoparametric" or "Isopar") elements.
Read More

Can I Delete An Automesh Without Deleting the Global Mesh Record?

  • Date: September 6, 2018
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization
To delete all automesh objects (elements and nodes) without deleting a global automesh record use Select > Mesh > Auto and click Delete:
Read More

How Do I Troubleshoot Small-Feature Automeshes?

  • Date: March 16, 2017
  • By: ESRD Admin
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization
When CAD files imported into StressCheck have very small geometric features, these are sometimes suppressed by the MeshSim automesher, resulting in elements not associated with the geometric surfaces in regions near the small features.
Read More

How Do I Debug Problem Meshing Face Error Messages?

  • Date: May 14, 2018
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Meshing & Discretization
In some cases, the MeshSim automesher may fail and provide the following error message (or similar): "MeshSim meshing error. Problem meshing face 1464095 at (0.059494844831943255, 0.14298635089067505, -0.011241197933960261)"
Read More

What Are Some Tips for Automeshing 3D Cracks for Accurate SIF Computation?

  • Date: January 13, 2021
  • By: brent
  • Categories: Fracture Mechanics Analysis, Meshing & Discretization
When extracting stress intensity factors (SIF's or K's) along a crack front that has been automeshed with tetra elements, the recommendation is to have two layers of refinements close to each other to reduce the aspect ratio of the tetras in the region of extraction; this mesh refinement strategy will minimize the mapping effect in the results and is applicable both for SIF and J-integral extractions.
Read More

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Next

Testimonials

“As the United States Air Force continues to extend the service life of their aircraft the Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) has had to refine the methods it uses to analyze and predict fatigue crack growth. Through the use StressCheck, coupled with AFGROW, we in A-10 ASIP have been able to more accurately model, predict and analyze critical aircraft structure for the A-10 and other types of structure for non-A-10 system managers. This also allows us within the A-10 to more accurately assess risk for decision makers, streamline aircraft inductions into scheduled maintenance and reduce cost for total life cycle management.”

A-10 ASIP Manager

Member Portal

  • Member Registration
  • Member Login

Contact Us

© 2026 · Engineering Software Research & Development, Inc. | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookie Policy | Software License Agreement | Software Maintenance and Technical Support Policy

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits, as outlined in our Cookie Policy. You may adjust your cookie preferences within .

ESRD
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.